PDA

View Full Version : Proof that Utah hates sex


Lacan
April 17th, 2009, 09:57 AM
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_12147241

Okay I'm getting sick of these anti sex people in this country by arresting people that are into it. This is clearly a violation between the separation of church and state.

Humans are suppose to naturally be sexual creatures. Trying to suppress a human's sexually is very dangerous and wrong. This is why we have rapist and pedophiles, is because in the past they were sexually suppressed to the point of insanity.

I am getting sick of these rednecks who hate sex. No wonder why people who hate sexuality are bitter and depressed, while people who love it are happy and cheerful.

Of course the kids lives are going to be ruined by the police that uses redneck Jeebus, and their fake "sex is evil" morals.

Of course I shouldn't be surprised since Utah is a Mormon state.

Gray
April 17th, 2009, 10:00 AM
Once again Lacan, you blow things way out of proportion. :facepalm:


Two American Fork fifth-graders could face criminal charges for looking at pornography on a school computer, but some people are wondering how they were able to access the images in the first place.

Police were called last week after two 11-year-old boys at Forbes Elementary School pulled up images of sexual acts on a school computer and then showed the pictures to nine other students, said American Fork Police Sgt. Gregg Ludlow. The incident came to light when one child told a parent and another told the principal.

snip.....

Ludlow called the images "pretty explicit" but declined to elaborate. He said the boys made multiple attempts on different days to access inappropriate material. Ultimately, they typed the word "lesbian" into a search engine and were able to pull up pictures not blocked by the school's Internet filter.



They're 5th graders who got in trouble because they looked up pornography on school computers and then showed the images around. And it's not like they did it accidentaly, it states quite cleary they they attempted to bypass the filter on several occasions. Try actually reading the article you quote next time.

Soluzar
April 17th, 2009, 10:00 AM
You do realise that what they did was inappropriate, don't you? One does not look up porn on a school computer. By societal standards one does not partake of porn before the age of majority. I admit that the response is extreme, but don't break the rules and you won't get punished. Nobody says that adults can't look at internet porn... nobody credible anyway.

Lacan
April 17th, 2009, 10:06 AM
And I wish this society would change and get rid of the dogma of sexuality is bad and evil. And yes I know they bypassed the filters and stuff on purpose.

Maybe I like too much freedom to the point that no one here sees my logic. But doesn't anyone here realizes that alot of these laws are based on religion, which is against the US Constitution. Thomas Paine would vomit if he saw how our country has become with these violations.

loplop
April 17th, 2009, 10:06 AM
Lacan, Did you even read the article involved here? :facepalm:

taily
April 17th, 2009, 10:08 AM
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_12147241

Okay I'm getting sick of these anti sex people in this country.

Ok. I only read this sentence, and based on this I conclude that by the end of the post you will have managed to convince yourself the goverment are putting bugs in condoms and arresting all who come within a 100m radius of them, and that within a year the evil, anti-sex goverment will have searched every household at least 5 times in search of semen, not to mention at least 2 night-time raids to catch anyone in the act.

Lacan
April 17th, 2009, 10:08 AM
Lacan, Did you even read the article involved here? :facepalm:

Yes I did, and so what if the 9 other students saw it? I want greater and greater freedom in this country. Maybe because its the year 2009, and I thought we would be living in a futuristic utopia without dogmas. Guess I was wrong.

Edit: I'm probably the weird minority that is deemed so crazy and liberal that even liberals think I'm crazy. People have to realize that I am not going agree with what everyone says here.

Gibb
April 17th, 2009, 10:34 AM
Yes I did, and so what if the 9 other students saw it? I want greater and greater freedom in this country. Maybe because its the year 2009, and I thought we would be living in a futuristic utopia without dogmas. Guess I was wrong.

Edit: I'm probably the weird minority that is deemed so crazy and liberal that even liberals think I'm crazy. People have to realize that I am not going agree with what everyone says here.

I still think you're off the mark a bit here. I agree that "sex" is a natural part of human behavior, but at the same time there is a lot of responsibility involved with it. Our culture has developed to the point where we protect underage people from getting involved with sex, and I feel that's a good decision. Short of dying, there's nothing that can destroy a life more than people having sex too young then ended up with an unwanted child, or worse an abortion. A bunch of 11 and 12 years olds looking at porn is not good because it could lead to other things if their parents haven't given them "the talk" yet.

Oh and Utah loves sex, haven't you ever heard of mormans?

Gray
April 17th, 2009, 10:35 AM
Edit: I'm probably the weird minority that is deemed so crazy and liberal that even liberals think I'm crazy. People have to realize that I am not going agree with what everyone says here.

I am sure you'd like to believe that your some kind of minority, Lacan. That your the last great hope for civil liberties, and the only man left on the face of this earth who can see the truth while all of us other sheep blindly follow our fascist government.

However, you seem to have blantently ignored everything said in this thread. You cleary did not read the article, because your making wild accusations about 'sex being illegal' or some nonsense with no foundation what-so-ever.

Bernard_Monsha
April 17th, 2009, 10:35 AM
Yes I did, and so what if the 9 other students saw it?

What if they or their parents did not want them to see it? What if he showed something Lemon Party or Tubgirl do you really want to expose kids to that in school.

I want greater and greater freedom in this country. Maybe because its the year 2009, and I thought we would be living in a futuristic utopia without dogmas. Guess I was wrong.


I am sorry, but my version of a Utopia does not in any way shape or form involve 11 year old boys spanking their monkeys to tub girl.

Lacan
April 17th, 2009, 10:39 AM
The real reason why I am freaking out is because they arrested the kids, instead of putting them in detention and have their parents punish them, instead of using the law to deal with them.

And personally that Lemon Party and Tub Girl stuff is scary.

I admit I overreact just like how Utah overreacts.

Suiko Eiji
April 17th, 2009, 10:52 AM
Thanks for adding some lulz to my day :)

One thing I'd like to touch (heh heh touch) on that no one else has addressed is that the perpetrators are minors and thus, don't have "rights". They bypassed systems they weren't supposed to; whether they were looking up teh prons or 'how to be a good American', they weren't supposed to be doing it.

Maybe I like too much freedom to the point that no one here sees my logic. But doesn't anyone here realizes that alot of these laws are based on religion, which is against the US Constitution.

Then take it to Federal court. I'm sure it'll fail because it has been deemed legal in other areas for States to restrict certain access and activities to those only of majority age. Kids can't buy smokes and can't buy booze, now can they?

I think you like too much the thought of kids and sex to the point that non one here sees your "logic".

I am getting sick of these rednecks who hate sex. No wonder why people who hate sexuality are bitter and depressed, while people who love it are happy and cheerful.

I seem to remember an informal study that showed people who voted/registered Republicans tended to have better, happier sex lives that those who were voted/registered Democrats. Sure, anecdotal at best but still thought I'd leave that here.

Lacan
April 17th, 2009, 10:57 AM
I don't mean kids having sex, I mean what harm does it for some 11 year old boy who got curious that happened to look at an X rated pic. And kids should not have sex, because its unhealthy at that age to. But if they want to peek at a naughty pic, then it should be okay.

Besides, even I am scared of that 13 year boy with his 15 year old girlfriend in the UK that happened to have a baby.

And yes I know the world is overpopulated, so we have to make sure that they are responsible adults before they do the act.

Edit: Though maybe people are right and kids shouldn't look at X rated material as they shouldn't look at R rated material, because alot of them will probably try and copy it? I really don't know anymore. As long as it is for secular reason to protect the kids, then its okay, and not by religious dogma.

waltsoph3
April 17th, 2009, 11:00 AM
woah woah woah time out here. I dont understand why your defending these kids Lacan. I meen i do agree that the school needs to be held accountable for some of the screw ups but these are kids we're talking about. They shouldn't even be looking at that kind of stuff at that age to begin with.

Lacan to me..this isnt anti-sex its just common sense. The mom also needs to scold the kids too. If they weren't into that stuff to begin with why didn't the kids report it.
I truly belive they made the right call on this one and there lucky that they aren't geting disciplined with a good paddle whipping.

Trust me man there is a huge difference from some the issues i may put into question at times. But on this one they made the right call and whats more important is WHY haven't all the schools comply with the filter system. Rember school is a public thing and all parents want is whats best for the kids education and safty. Does that help out?

Gray
April 17th, 2009, 11:01 AM
I don't mean kids having sex, I mean what harm does it for some 11 year old boy who got curious that happened to look at an X rated pic. And kids should not have sex, because its unhealthy at that age to. But if they want to peek at a naughty pic, then it should be okay.

For the 3RD TIME, YOU CLEARLY DID NOT READ THE ARTICLE YOU QUOTED. God its even worse than talking to a brick wall, atleast with the wall i'd know that I would be talking to something.

These two kids, tried on several occasions to bypass the schools mature content filter and look at pornography.

Here, let me try and help you understand.

A) They did this at SCHOOL.

B) They tried several times, and in the end typed 'lesbian' into a search engine.

C) When they finnally did succeed, they passed the images around to other students. That blows your 'I was just curious' theory out of the water, but you'd know that if you bothered to read the article before jumping onto your soapbox.

Or hey, maybe, we should let the 5th graders vote, have a drink at the pub and then bet on some ponies? We don't want to deny them thier freedoms like a bunch of 'rednecks' now do we?

DavenIII
April 17th, 2009, 11:03 AM
there lucky that they aren't geting disciplined with a good paddle whipping.



no they aren't, that would be the correct sort of punishment, having them arrested is FAR worse imho.

Ikari Warrior
April 17th, 2009, 11:03 AM
I admit I overreact just like how Utah overreacts.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction? I agree that the kids should not have been arrested, that's a bit extreme, IMO, but that'll learn 'em to look at porn whilst at school.

DavenIII
April 17th, 2009, 11:06 AM
Or hey, maybe, we should let the 5th graders vote, have a drink at the pub and then bet on some ponies? We don't want to deny them thier freedoms like a bunch of 'rednecks' now do we?

I'd have no problem with that, I'd bet alot of 5th graders know more about American politics then many people 18+

I certainly had a few drinks by 5th grade, nothing major but I'd drank at least a "Shot" and a "Beer" by that time.

betting on the ponies might be a bit overboard, but if they did it from home with their own money...well they are only hurting themselves and it might teach them a valuable lesson about money.

Lacan
April 17th, 2009, 11:06 AM
Maybe I am starting to see something here. I might have to agree with you guys on this one. I admit I am not thinking correctly today. Maybe its the arresting the kids thing that made me overreact, to the point of my own stupidity.

The Million Dollar Prons
April 17th, 2009, 11:08 AM
whether they were looking up teh prons or 'how to be a good American', they weren't supposed to be doing it.



Did you just SUMMON me and then call me a good american?


When I was a kid, this one kid brought some porn to class. I kicked his *** and took the porno. He told the prinicpal, he got grounded. It was pretty weak porno too it wasn't worth him getting grounded for.

Bottom line, if you let your kids look at porno they will grow up to be just like me.

Lacan
April 17th, 2009, 11:10 AM
I really should of named this topic different like "Utah Hates Porn", or "Arresting kids for internet Porn too harsh"?

DavenIII
April 17th, 2009, 11:10 AM
Did you just SUMMON me and then call me a good american?


When I was a kid, this one kid brought some porn to class. I kicked his *** and took the porno. He told the prinicpal, he got grounded. It was pretty weak porno too it wasn't worth him getting grounded for.

pretty sure I exposed myself in 2nd or 3rd grade, I know for certain I used to chill with this chick underneath a blanket in my parents basement in 2nd or 3rd grade nekkid touching and stuff cause we were curious.

that's probably worse then a magazine.

Lacan
April 17th, 2009, 11:21 AM
I wish there was a change the name of the topic option.

And here is something, I overreact on alot of things to the point that I become stupid.

But I surrender, everyone AN wins, and I lose, because I was wrong this time.

The Million Dollar Prons
April 17th, 2009, 11:22 AM
pretty sure I exposed myself in 2nd or 3rd grade, I know for certain I used to chill with this chick underneath a blanket in my parents basement in 2nd or 3rd grade nekkid touching and stuff cause we were curious.

that's probably worse then a magazine.

Yeah I went to Christian Youth Camp also.



that's probably worse then a magazine.

Depends on the magazine. If I caught you reading playboy I'd beat you with my belt. Not because I'm against beein an alcoholic porn addict but because playboy is a lousy magazine.

DavenIII
April 17th, 2009, 11:24 AM
Yeah I went to Christian Youth Camp also.

<----Jewish.

Anyhow though it was in a Public School class.



Depends on the magazine. If I caught you reading playboy I'd beat you with my belt. Not because I'm against beein an alcoholic porn addict but because playboy is a lousy magazine.

Agreed!

The Million Dollar Prons
April 17th, 2009, 11:27 AM
<----Jewish.


<----- Has all 9 seasons of Seinfeld on DVD.



Agreed!


I had a friend named Pablo once and he acted all tough because he bought a playboy when he turned 18.

That night he came home and I kicked his *** and threw him out the window like in that comic book "The Watchmen" except he lived on the ground floor and was mexican so he couldn't afford any windows so he just sort of got kind of bruised.

waltsoph3
April 17th, 2009, 11:39 AM
no they aren't, that would be the correct sort of punishment, having them arrested is FAR worse imho.

You do understand that in some states whiping your kid can be classified as an act of child abuse right? But don't get me wrong they deserve a good whipping.

About the jail part..i don't think its gonna be that extreme if its just there first time. I could see them getting some comunity servce. But in a ways when you guys think about it..its better then just doing nothing.

Another intresting point since you did bring up the kids doing time..heres a
good question..
Will the parents face jail time,fines, or some other kind of sentence from the law as well? I know some states do that.

I wish there was a change the name of the topic option.

And here is something, I overreact on alot of things to the point that I become stupid.

But I surrender, everyone AN wins, and I lose, because I was wrong this time.


Hey don't hit yourself too hard. We make mistakes. It happens ok.

Ikari Warrior
April 17th, 2009, 11:53 AM
I wish there was a change the name of the topic option.
Can't you or a mod do that by editing the first post? I know there's a way.

And here is something, I overreact on alot of things to the point that I become stupid.
We know that. Here's a thought: the next time you have the urge to post immediately after reading something like this...resist. Take a step back, and try to examine the situation rationally. Then you can make a composed post without flying off the handle, as you're infamous for.
But I surrender, everyone AN wins, and I lose, because I was wrong this time.
Oh please don't surrender. Your illogical romps in futility give the most argumentative of us a reason to really dust our bats off and go swingin'.

DavenIII
April 17th, 2009, 11:57 AM
You do understand that in some states whiping your kid can be classified as an act of child abuse right? kind of sentence from the law as well? I know some states do that.


I understand the law, I also realize that its ridiculous.

growing up I was hit, shoes thrown at me etc etc I hid behind my bedroom door once and my father squashed me with it till it poped the hinges off when I was 15.

I'm 27 now, and I'm 100 times better because I got hit, talking to me would not have done any good.

waltsoph3
April 17th, 2009, 12:03 PM
Hey Lacan what do you say we close down this thread. Theres no need for it to continue. It was an accident and i do agree i wish there was a way to rename a topic thread. It can help avoid confusion.

DavenIII
April 17th, 2009, 12:25 PM
better proof is Utah Stripclubs, most stripclubs you are not supposed to touch the girl when she gives you a dance but she is supposed to touch you, but in utah (apparently) the strippers and the guys aren't even allowed to touch by law.

tofuman
April 17th, 2009, 12:30 PM
The kids do deserve to be in trouble with the School. But calling the Cops and facing criminal charges is way to extreme.

goddessofanime
April 17th, 2009, 12:35 PM
Whoever was in charge of the computer should be in trouble for not having filter blockers, not those kids. I have to agree with Lacan...that's way too harsh.

Only thing I agree is that it was stupid of the kids to try to access teh porn in school...

Off topic: ROFL at 'mormans'

Gibb
April 17th, 2009, 12:38 PM
Whoever was in charge of the computer should be in trouble for not having filter blockers, not those kids. I have to agree with Lacan...that's way too harsh.

Only thing I agree is that it was stupid of the kids to try to access teh porn in school...

The computers did have filters, but the kids repeatedly tried things until they got around the filter. No automated filter will ever be good enough to stop such a thing, the only way would be to have somebody watch over the kid's shoulder the entire time.

goddessofanime
April 17th, 2009, 12:39 PM
They computers did have filters, but the kids repeatedly tried things until they got around the filter. No automated filter will ever be good enough to stop such a thing, the only way would be to have somebody watch over the kid's shoulder the entire time.

Well, maybe there should've been.

Usually there's someone monitoring things...isn't there?

Gibb
April 17th, 2009, 12:43 PM
Well, maybe there should've been.

Usually there's someone monitoring things...isn't there?

I think there should be a teacher in the computer lab at all times (when it is open), but perhaps they couldn't staff it at that particular school. Teachers are getting more scarce these days due to how poorly they're paid.

Gray
April 17th, 2009, 12:46 PM
I used to bypass the filter on our high school computers all the time so I could play Tetris during Visual Basic :lol:

Trefellin
April 17th, 2009, 12:48 PM
What is ridiculous about this situation is that they may face criminal charges. That's just silly.

Maybe they wouldn't have been looking up porn at school if they had some decent pornography at home. What about that?!

DavenIII
April 17th, 2009, 12:48 PM
The computers did have filters, but the kids repeatedly tried things until they got around the filter. No automated filter will ever be good enough to stop such a thing, the only way would be to have somebody watch over the kid's shoulder the entire time.

Filters fault, make it better, give the kids suspension for finding away around it fine, but call the cops.... come on.

l0k1
April 17th, 2009, 12:48 PM
This is why we have rapist and pedophiles, is because in the past they were sexually suppressed to the point of insanity.


A quote almost worthy of a signature, good job :thumbsup:

I call shanagians OP is a troll.

goddessofanime
April 17th, 2009, 12:49 PM
Filters fault, make it better, give the kids suspension for finding away around it fine, but call the cops.... come on.

EXACTLY.



(not a morman)

Holy Knight
April 17th, 2009, 12:56 PM
Isn't this excessive?

Back in my days, kids used to this all the time in computer lab class, with the teacher in plain view. Nothing more than a stern reprimand was given.

I'm not going to defend the kids, but the punishment is much too severe in this day and age of prolific porn sites on the 'net. They need to lighten up on the "gravity" of viewing inappropriate content. Since computer filters were bypassed, school policy should intervene, not the law.

They're just 11 years old, they probably just discovered the stuff, and wanted to share with classmates because it was "cool", found there was a filter, and without knowing the consequences, tried to find ways to bypass it.

Lacan's suppositions are extreme, but he does have a point in that this is excessive.

superplough
April 17th, 2009, 02:09 PM
Kids got arrested for looking up porn at school? Well, that's slightly over the top IMO.

All that happened to anyone doing that at our school was they lost their computer privileges.

Bernard_Monsha
April 17th, 2009, 02:29 PM
Isn't this excessive?


No, Chris Hansen might have to get involved.

Certain aspects of the boys' actions warranted the police's involvement, but Bromley said there were also concerns for the students' safety. Officials also needed to investigate the incident fully to determine whether there were adults outside the school trying to communicate to students on the inappropriate sites. Bromley said the server has been taken from the school to investigate everything that happened during the incident, as well as whether it has happened before.

DavenIII
April 17th, 2009, 02:37 PM
oh for godsake what a waste of tax payer money, don't they have some REAL crime to investigate.

Leader Desslock
April 17th, 2009, 02:54 PM
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction? I agree that the kids should not have been arrested, that's a bit extreme, IMO, but that'll learn 'em to look at porn whilst at school.
Well, if they just looked at the porn, it would be one thing. But they passed them around.

Which is, technically, distributing pornography to minors. A crime, so I'm led to believe.

Now, if they hadn't called the police, and the parents of one of the kids who were shown this porn found out that the crime hadn't even been reported, that would've opened up the school to a nice lawsuit. So they had to have the kids arrested.

Besides, what better way to get kids to behave? Public humiliation of offenders can certainly provide a decent incentive to good behaviour.


Lacan - you keep bringing up Utah and Mormons, but neither of these factors are relevant. The same exact thing could've happened in an atheist community in Vermont. This is not about fundamentalist prudery; it's about kids looking at porn on a school computer.

You're running neck and neck with Waltsoph for this year's Minoru award. Just FYI.

Chidori Raikiri
April 17th, 2009, 03:03 PM
11 and 12 years olds looking at porn is not good because it could lead to other things if their parents haven't given them "the talk" yet.

Adults are out of touch... That, or the times have changed. Every kid knows what sex is by the age of 9.

Gibb
April 17th, 2009, 03:16 PM
Adults are out of touch... That, or the times have changed. Every kid knows what sex is by the age of 9.

That said, learning about sex from the internet or by watching primetime television can be pretty damaging to young people.

Bernard_Monsha
April 17th, 2009, 03:19 PM
Adults are out of touch... That, or the times have changed. Every kid knows what sex is by the age of 9.

Yeah but they don't know what 2G1C is nor should they have too.

Shiroiyuki
April 17th, 2009, 05:10 PM
And I wish this society would change and get rid of the dogma of sexuality is bad and evil.

I'm pretty sure fifth graders don't need to see Two Girls and a Cup to function properly as members of our society.

Could be just me though. Lacan, don't be a hippie.


[edit]
Damnit Monsha, responses like yours require me to read the entire thread before posting. Ugh. :lol:

Old Ape Face
April 17th, 2009, 05:11 PM
Lacan just wants to do it with his 13 year old friends, and he wants to get away with it too.

Lacan
April 17th, 2009, 05:24 PM
Lacan just wants to do it with his 13 year old friends, and he wants to get away with it too.

I prefer adults at age 20-30, thank you very much.

I don't want to be framed for something that I don't do or support doing. The thing is on the internet innocent people can be framed, and what you just did is scary for me. If I get arrested for something I never did or will never do, because of being framed, I'll get you in court too.

EDIT: I know you are joking, but with this country these days, any innocent person can get arrested, even if they are framed. I like older women, heck there are some women that are in their mid 30s that I wouldn't mind dating.

EDIT 2: I know I am overreacting again, but we live in a crazy ultra sensitive government runned country. Don't you think some Cris Hanson type person is watching this and believing your joke to be true, even though it isn't.

Broand
April 17th, 2009, 05:29 PM
^ I'm sure that avatar won't help you either in that regard.

l0k1
April 17th, 2009, 05:41 PM
Don't you think some Cris Hanson type person is watching this and believing your joke to be true, even though it isn't.

No, not really.

Shiroiyuki
April 17th, 2009, 06:02 PM
EDIT 2: I know I am overreacting again, but we live in a crazy ultra sensitive government runned country.

If you have gone to the doctor recently, donated blood, or have been through surgery and are often plagued by a phantom electrical hum (like the noise off a TV when it's not turned on), chances are you have been tagged.

Big Brother can monitor you a lot better; pinpoint your exact location on the map at any given time. Like they do with birds.

You should search for these chips and remove them immediately. Be warned that they aren't just under the skin; they'll be buried inside a major organ just in case you ever find out the truth.

Directions for Usage:

1. Get knife. Rusty ones cut deeper, use them.
2. Prepare the area for cutting by rubbing lemon juice and salt onto your skin.
3. Think happy thoughts of total freedom from an overbearing government.
4. Get knife-happy and just start carving the **** out of it.
5. Dig around with your hand until you find something that doesn't squish. Pull it.
6. Lay on the ground and twitch, most likely.


Disclaimer:
Sudden vomiting, blood loss, dizziness, abdominal pain, and even death may occur. Those of you searching should not consume alcohol more than the recommended dosage prescribed to you by a local drunkard...because this **** will hurt.

For more information consult your primary care physician, as they will want to make sure the tag's anti-tamper device self-destructs properly once you leave their office.

Suiko Eiji
April 17th, 2009, 07:12 PM
I don't want to be framed for something that I don't do or support doing. The thing is on the internet innocent people can be framed, and what you just did is scary for me. If I get arrested for something I never did or will never do, because of being framed, I'll get you in court too.

Why, yes, innocent people being convicted falls into one of two realms - mistakes and framing.

And, there's little anyone can do to you about slander and libel, especially on the Internet. No matter how pervasive you think the surveillance society on the Internet is, getting people into court is an entirely different matter, let alone a conviction. I've told either you or waltsoph before, take off the tin foil hat.

@Minoru-Award: Please, I hope someone is archiving these threads, I want to re-read this **** in December.

Trefellin
April 17th, 2009, 07:17 PM
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d88/SNAPitskelly/aluminum_foil.jpg

Someone needs to make a hat I think.

Caster13
April 17th, 2009, 08:33 PM
Yeah but they don't know what 2G1C is nor should they have too.

Nobody should ever know/have known about that. Nor should that Spawn of Satan have ever been created. I saw part of that and almost threw up. (I was dared to watch it and there was a rather large amount of money involved) I couldn't make it all the way through.

fujyoshi
April 18th, 2009, 06:46 AM
wait wait those kids didn't even have a computer block. When I was in school(high school) they literally got to the point where they blocked google out so for those kids to be able to search that there had ta be something not right wit the filter system. Although in terms of utah so called "hating sex" the first thing that came to my mind was a state full of 2D complex people possible

Victory
April 18th, 2009, 07:58 AM
This one time at band camp... actually these multiple times in high school, people installed the SubSeven trojan on school computers. Another lad also had a justified reputation for spanking it in front of the school library computers. Well they are 5th-graders, maybe it's different? Also mormon state.

SlackerDude
April 18th, 2009, 08:21 AM
Geeze can't the cops just leave it alone and let their parents spank the **** out of them and ground them or something? What America needs to do is get the sand out of its vagina. Or at least some of it.

waltsoph3
April 18th, 2009, 09:22 AM
Sigh..well i try to save a friends degnity and this is what happens when i get back on today.

Being nominated for the uhm whats it called the Minoru award. Well its nice to know i may have an oppertunity to win an award based on a horse that once belonged to a king. In a ways when to think about..at least it shows some worth in royalty.lol

Seriously guys get off my back with that crap . I don't care about that garbage. I just come on AN to speak my mind. Not to win proxie trophies.

What do you say we get back yo more important things. Can we try to do that.

Again i really belive they made the right call here and i think all the kids may get is a little slap on the wrist. Mainly comunity service.

I meen what more do you guys want? Most of you think the punishment is too harsh while some say it was the right thing to do.

But can we at least agree on this..To do nothing is not the right answer to resolve this problem. Because doing nothing would only meen they would do it again. At least thats what i would think.

Ikari Warrior
April 18th, 2009, 09:51 AM
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d88/SNAPitskelly/aluminum_foil.jpg

Someone needs to make a hat I think.

I seriously love you guys.

superplough
April 18th, 2009, 02:11 PM
That said, learning about sex from the internet or by watching primetime television can be pretty damaging to young people.

That's how I learnt about it ^_^

Seriously, my parents never told me anything. I found it all out myself.

RecentMidget
April 18th, 2009, 02:16 PM
http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o177/dark_heaven2006/morals.jpg

RecentMidget
April 18th, 2009, 02:22 PM
BTW walt...found the perfect pic for you

http://i509.photobucket.com/albums/s334/moralitymachine/morality20machine20logo.jpg

The Million Dollar Prons
April 18th, 2009, 02:36 PM
I meen what more do you guys want?

I wanna see what porn they were looking at. I wanna know if those kids have what it takes to last 5 minutes on my hard drive.

goddessofanime
April 18th, 2009, 02:39 PM
That's how I learnt about it ^_^

Seriously, my parents never told me anything. I found it all out myself.

I learned it from a book.

GreatNekoKoneko
April 18th, 2009, 06:51 PM
...lesbians are beautiful creatures. until they start wearing birkenstocks and plaid.

Trefellin
April 18th, 2009, 07:05 PM
I think the problem is that some youths don't have access to good, wholesome pornography at home.

ThePhillyFlash
April 19th, 2009, 01:15 AM
That's how I learnt about it ^_^

Seriously, my parents never told me anything. I found it all out myself.

Ditto! Oh, yeah, and a heaping dose of Hustler and Penthouse Forum! :lol:

Lacan
April 19th, 2009, 04:50 AM
I have a feeling that these days alot kids already know adult rated things. Unless someone here can prove me wrong?

I really don't know what they do these days? In my days as a kid, we used to do innocent things like play with action figures, toys, video games, and talk about how great Mario and Freddy Krueger is *Yeah I know it was a R Rated movie, but we used to talk about him all the time in 1988*.

The Million Dollar Prons
April 19th, 2009, 07:22 AM
I have a feeling that these days alot kids already know adult rated things. Unless someone here can prove me wrong?

I really don't know what they do these days? In my days as a kid, we used to do innocent things like play with action figures, toys, video games, and talk about how great Mario and Freddy Krueger is *Yeah I know it was a R Rated movie, but we used to talk about him all the time in 1988*.

You've never tried to make the action figures hump eachother, take the clothes off a barbie, talk about Chun Li's tits or the tits in the Nightmare on Elm Street movies?

By the way the first Nightmare on Elmstreet movie was so badass. That scene where the ***** gets it on the ceiling owned my life.

waltsoph3
April 19th, 2009, 10:27 AM
http://i509.photobucket.com/albums/s334/moralitymachine/morality20machine20logo.jpg[/QUOTE]
lol aww come on i'm no mr morality perfect. Belive it or not i am flexable on some things.
I do slang and curse but i try to keep that in check since all ages look at this stuff.

I have a feeling that these days alot kids already know adult rated things. Unless someone here can prove me wrong?

I really don't know what they do these days? In my days as a kid, we used to do innocent things like play with action figures, toys, video games, and talk about how great Mario and Freddy Krueger is *Yeah I know it was a R Rated movie, but we used to talk about him all the time in 1988*.
Amen to that. :D I rember the good old days of the 80's.
Also at 9 it was my first Halloween seeing some kids in freedy and Jason costumes. lol those were cool. I even had a real green and red sweater, but after elm street they banned them at stores.lol unbelivable.

Man have things drasticly change in less then 20 years.
Things changed over the years but again to me the key is parents need to take responsabilty as well. I know they can't be there for em 24/7 because of jobs and such but they need to be there for them and just keep tabs.

I wanna see what porn they were looking at. I wanna know if those kids have what it takes to last 5 minutes on my hard drive.

lol your horriable man. :P

You've never tried to make the action figures hump eachother, take the clothes off a barbie, talk about Chun Li's tits or the tits in the Nightmare on Elm Street movies?

By the way the first Nightmare on Elmstreet movie was so badass. That scene where the ***** gets it on the ceiling owned my life.

All i got to say is i got a logo perfect for prons.

In Prons we trust.

lol What do you think man. You like it?

Trefellin
April 19th, 2009, 10:31 AM
All i got to say is i got a logo perfect for prons.

In Prons we trust.

lol What do you think man. You like it?

We? Speak for yourself man. He's an awesome guy but I wouldn't trust Prons to sit on a toilet correctly.

The Million Dollar Prons
April 19th, 2009, 12:35 PM
We? Speak for yourself man. He's an awesome guy but I wouldn't trust Prons to sit on a toilet correctly.

Why because you know I'd be rigging up a hidden camera behind the water closet OH CRAP NOW THEY KNOW MY PLAN ah they probably could have guessed it anyway

goddessofanime
April 19th, 2009, 01:05 PM
I have a feeling that these days alot kids already know adult rated things. Unless someone here can prove me wrong?

I really don't know what they do these days? In my days as a kid, we used to do innocent things like play with action figures, toys, video games, and talk about how great Mario and Freddy Krueger is *Yeah I know it was a R Rated movie, but we used to talk about him all the time in 1988*.


Maybe I hung out with a sluttier crowd or something:

We talked about innocent things when I was 11, but we also were all curious as well....like, 'OOOH boys have penises! hehehehe"

l0k1
April 19th, 2009, 01:17 PM
I had a book called 'How the body works' and it had robot drawings (i mean literal strange square robots) demonstrating how everything worked, i was shocked to discover my idea of a naked female was amazingly wrong thanks to this.

DavenIII
April 19th, 2009, 09:50 PM
Maybe I hung out with a sluttier crowd or something:

We talked about innocent things when I was 11, but we also were all curious as well....like, 'OOOH boys have penises! hehehehe"

Unless I'm not normal (And I think I'm pretty normal well maybe a little more fun then the next guy...but overall normal childhood) I'd say that's pretty normal, I think if you never were curious and never talked about it with friends at that age that would be weird.

RecentMidget
April 19th, 2009, 11:52 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh_peXHCX04

THAT IS ALL!!!

goddessofanime
April 20th, 2009, 10:18 AM
Unless I'm not normal (And I think I'm pretty normal well maybe a little more fun then the next guy...but overall normal childhood) I'd say that's pretty normal, I think if you never were curious and never talked about it with friends at that age that would be weird.



I had this book that had pictures of anatomy and uh...how they did it (It was a kids book...not like the Kama Sutra) and why friends and I would be all, 'OOH that's you and so-and-so doin' it.."

All 11 year olds are curious