PDA

View Full Version : General comic-book movie discussion.


kittynboi
November 11th, 2006, 07:52 PM
I decided to start this because people are talking about it in the Spiderman 3 trailer thread, and this way it won't get too off topic over there, and people not interested in spider man 3 in specific might have more a chance of seeing it.

I think there have been plenty of good comic based films, but plenty of bad ones.

Films based on comics that are good;

Batman
Batman Returns
Batman Begins
SpiderMan
The Crow
Sin City
Ghost World
Art School Confidential
V For Vendetta

Comic characters or books that I'd like to see given a GOOD big screen treatment;
100 Bullets (if the right director did this it could be SO awesome.)
Jimmy Corrigan:The Smartest Kid On Earth
Cerebus (this would have to be animated or maybe a Roger Rabbit style thing)
Bone (A good, respectful, non-dumbed down animated version of Bone would RULE.)
Y: The Last Man
The Spectre
Green Arrow (Prefferably based on The longbow Hunters stories)
Green Lantern (Of course, they could not feature anyone BUT Hal Jordan. The nerds would have it no other way.)
Box Office Poison
Rusty Brown
An animated series of Quimby Mouse shorts could be cool if done right.
Marvels
Kingdom Come
The Sandman
Like a Velvet Glove Cast In Iron

Some of these, actually probably all but a few, have all been the subject of consideration for a big screen adaption. Last I heard there work was beginning on a Flash feature film, but I don't know if thats far along enough to get out of development hell for good or not.

People have often approached Dave Sim about doing an animated Cerebus film, but given his somewhat adversarial, ambivalent stance on things like shameless marketing, creators rights, and letting others handle a comic artists work, it should come as no surprise that he has never expressed interest. Probably the only way it will ever get done is once he and Gerhard are dead, since they have arranged for Cerebus to pass in to the public domain once they have both passed on.

Jeff Smith has been approached many times about doing an animated Bone film, but he has never agreed to the terms. He spoke of one specific incident in which Nickelodeon expressed interest, but they wanted child actors to do the voices of the Bone cousins, and wanted Britney Spears music in it, and that kind fo thing. Smith has, apparently, been at the end of these sorts of offers, and he dislikes them because he thinks it shows that his work isn't being taken seriously. He wants a respectful treatment that is not dumbed down.

Things like Green Arrow, Green Lantern, Wonder Woman, and sometimes the more famous Elseworlds books like Kingdom Come, are occasionally the subject of rumors that a film may be made, and pitches probably are made, but that brings us back to the infamous "development hell" that seems to afflict adaptions of comics and other such material moreso that other films.

Chris Ware, given his rising star status since 2000 and his recent job as a cartoonist for the New York Times, will probably eventually be approached about turning one of his more well known works, most likely Jimmy Corrigan, in to a small-modest budget, indie-ish film, the same way David Clowes' Ghost World and Art School Confidential have been adapted to moderate, less mainstream success. Though I don't know what Ware thinks of adapting comics in to films, so I have no clue if he would agree. With the right director and actors, though, I think a Jimmy Corrigan or Rusty Brown film could be pretty good.

I would be honestly VERY surprised if no one has ever apporached Neil Gaiman about turning The Sandman in to a feature film, but I can think of very few directors/producers/teams in general that could make it as good as it should be.


One of the biggest, most enduring rumors, legends, hope and fear of comic die hards is the issue of whether or not Alan Moore's Watchmen will be turned in to a film. I myself am undecided on whether or not that could be done well, because it would have to be a LONG film. Watchmen has such a dense, deeply layered, labyrinthine story that even removing a few small elements could cause the rest to lose the unique impact the story has, if not cause it to collapse altogether. Watchmen changed comics, but I'm not sure if its Hollywood material. There have always been rumors, and sometimes things do get beyond the talking stages to perhaps some writing, but plans for a Watchmen film always seem to get cancelled for whatever reason.

On the topic of Moore, he has said in interviews that he has never been satisfied with how any of his material has been treated by Hollywood. From Hell was a good film on its own, but from what I recall of the comic, the two stories diverge somewhat radically (The comic focused more on the character of Jack the Ripper, while Johnny Depp's character was a much more minor element to the story.) V For Vendetta I thought was good, and while it had some silly aspects to it, I liked it. League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was awful, and all the humor that made the original comic so delightful was just absent from the film.

Well, I have no closing comments for this post, so I'll just baruptly end it since I can't think of anything else to write in it.

Mazinkaiser
November 11th, 2006, 09:02 PM
Which version of the Spectre do you speak of? I'd love to see one with Jim Corrigan, but with themes and ideas from the Hal Jordan version of the Specre, (like the themes of redemption and the Spectre's niece)

Here is a list of comics that I would love to see as movies
The Sandman (I believe there actually have been plans to try and adapt it, but I believe they had difficulties with the script.)
Plastic Man
The Books of Magic
Kingdom Come
Animal Man
The Watchmen
Dark Knight Returns
Starman (Jack Knight)
JSA
Formerly Known as the Justice League

kittynboi
November 11th, 2006, 09:14 PM
Any version would be fine, but given the vast popularity among the nerds who it would be aimed at they would probably go with the Jim Corrigan version. I don't think making Hal Jordan the Spectre would sit too well because it would either mean showing him as a Green Lantern for only a brief moment, which people would see as a tease, or omitting the GL aspect from Hal Jordans life, and you can imagine how some of the DC Die Hards would react to that.

When choosing characters for film adaptions, its usually best to err on the side of caution and go with the most "classic" character in a case like this. A Spectre film could also be good if they somehow worked in cameos from other magic themed DC characters, such as Dr. Fate or The Phantom Stranger.

There were plans, for a time, to do a film adaption of The Dark Knight Returns, starring Clint Eastwood as Batman, and filmed in Tokyo. This was one of the many ideas, along with a Batman Beyond adaption and a more direct, low key adaption of Year One, that were tossed around before Batman Begins solidified.

A nice bit of trivia; WB expected Batman and Robin to do well, and were all ready to start on another film in the Burton/Schumacher timeline. As I understand it, they literally cancelled that film on the day, or weekend, Batman and Robin opened because it did so horribly commercially and critically. Some people regard Batman and Robin as the first film the internet caused to fail when word spread online so quickly about how bad it was.

Blankets is another that could make a good indie type romance drama. Its pretty heavy on angst and would probably go over well with the Emo crowd.

Sendo Takeshi
November 11th, 2006, 09:46 PM
Movie tiers:

Batman Begins > Spiderman 2 > Xmen 2 > Spiderman 1 >>>>> Blade 1 > Xmen 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Superman Returns > Blade 2 > Punisher > Constantine


Y The Last Man needs to be made into a movie. That book is too Goddamn good.

As for the Spectre, they would go with the Jim Corrigan version because Hal Jordan is a Green Lantern again in the comics(after being brought back to life). I'm beginning to wonder if Superman Returns will get a sequel. After all, it didn't do too well in theaters.

kittynboi
November 11th, 2006, 09:53 PM
I was surprised that Superman Returns did so badly in theatres. Maybe people are starting to get burned out on superhero films in general. X3 did well financially, but not critically. I think the reception of X3 was bad enough to hurt any future X-Films.

Sendo Takeshi
November 11th, 2006, 09:58 PM
I was surprised that Superman Returns did so badly in theatres. Maybe people are starting to get burned out on superhero films in general. X3 did well financially, but not critically. I think the reception of X3 was bad enough to hurt any future X-Films.



The sad part about the X-Franchise is that there IS a 4th movie in mind at the moment. The question is: Will Bryan Singer come crawling back and make it good again? They were hinting around an origin story(!).

And you're right. People are being burned out. The market is becoming oversaturated with comic book movies. Everyone here remembers when Blade 1 came out, right? You were like "Sh!t! This movie is fire!" Then came a long hiatus until Xmen 1 came out. Then there was a break after that. Then Spiderman 1 was announced and EVERYONE jizzed their pants. Spidey opens up and cleans house and makes Stan Lee a bajillion dollars. Now EVERYONE thinks that comic book movies are cool and Hollywood decides to take advantage.

Next thing you know, DC has to jump in on the craze. They get a bunch of British people and BOOM! Batman is cool again. Hiatus' are a good thing every now and then.

__________________________


On the current movie front: Ghost Rider comes out in February IIRC. And of course, there's Ironman which is in production now and The Dark Knight begins production in two months. YAY for oversaturation.[/contradiction]

kittynboi
November 11th, 2006, 10:32 PM
Yeah, as I said, Batman And Robin caused the first hiatus. The first TIm Burton Batman film kicked of a small upsurge in superhero and comic films in the 1990s, and then Batman and Robin bombed so bad that studios became wary, and only a small amount of superhero and comic films were made for a few years.

If I recall correctly, X-Men was almost a kind of experiment. People wanted an X-Film and a Spiderman film, so X-Men was given the greenlight, and whether or not it did well was to be the basis of whether or not Spiderman got the green light. It cleaned up at the box office, and spidey got the green light.

I think for there to be another big crunch style hiatus where studios fear comic adaptions, we would need another batman and robin style disaster. The Dark Knight will likely do well and be recieved well critically, at least as well as Begins. Ghost Rider will probably bomb, but it seems like they're not expecting it to be on the same level as X-Men/Batman/Spiderman anyway. I know Iron Man is in the works, but I know little about it. And of course, theres supposed to be more Sin City on the way.

Vaikyuko
November 12th, 2006, 05:34 AM
I guess I'm the resident Marvel nut...

^Iron Man is set for a 2008 release date, the director has a MySpace group where he's been releasing updates himself to the public, Robert Downey Jr. has been cast as Iron Man (rofl), and the villain is Mandarin. There's been some rejected suit designs, but I don't know why they were rejected (at least the second set - two sets, two suits, the second suit was much better if not for the face). That's basically all anyone knows (oh, and there's some details regarding the actual comic cast - obviously Stark, as well as Rhodes and Stark's secretary and some old guy who is oddly familiar).

I wouldn't mind for Y - The Last Man to get a film adaptation, as it is pretty good, but I don't see it maintaining staying power if they decide to do a trilogy type thing. The later arcs of the book just aren't as enjoyable, although finally getting some answers in #51 was nice. For the most part, though, I'm seeing just about every comic book movie they're making, just because. XD

On the note of a Watchmen film, I would only see it for Rorschach, and even then, I probably wouldn't like it at all. You can't take Watchmen and compress it. You just can't. There's too many little details. Too many things to go over, too much characterization and major scenes. Not to mention some of the imagery, unless it was removed from the film version, might all add up and give the film something beyond an R rating, requiring it to be toned down. *rolls eyes*

MonkeyBoy0314
November 12th, 2006, 06:45 AM
Is this true what I'm hearing about Galactus being the villain in the second Fantastic Four movie? That would be so awesome, but before they do that they need to give Silver Surfer his own film.

Vaikyuko
November 12th, 2006, 10:08 AM
Is this true what I'm hearing about Galactus being the villain in the second Fantastic Four movie? That would be so awesome, but before they do that they need to give Silver Surfer his own film.

The film is titled "Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer". What has been released is a general plot sketching out Doom's return, Silver Surfer's arrival and change from general villain to anti-hero/hero, and Galactus is supposed to show up near the end. How they will work in everyone's favorite planet devouring man in purple tights, no idea.

Sendo Takeshi
November 12th, 2006, 12:22 PM
I guess I'm the resident Marvel nut...

^Iron Man is set for a 2008 release date, the director has a MySpace group where he's been releasing updates himself to the public, Robert Downey Jr. has been cast as Iron Man (rofl), and the villain is Mandarin. There's been some rejected suit designs, but I don't know why they were rejected (at least the second set - two sets, two suits, the second suit was much better if not for the face). That's basically all anyone knows (oh, and there's some details regarding the actual comic cast - obviously Stark, as well as Rhodes and Stark's secretary and some old guy who is oddly familiar).

I wouldn't mind for Y - The Last Man to get a film adaptation, as it is pretty good, but I don't see it maintaining staying power if they decide to do a trilogy type thing. The later arcs of the book just aren't as enjoyable, although finally getting some answers in #51 was nice. For the most part, though, I'm seeing just about every comic book movie they're making, just because. XD




Y The Last Man is consistently good. I don't know what you're talking about. Much better than 3/4's of the nonsense Marvel is putting out. Ed Brubaker is the saviour of Marvel Comics. Everything begins and ends with his word. Praise be the Church of Bru. And Brian K. Vaughn's Dr. Strange book is also better than anything Marvel has. Y would make a great movie.

And Robert Downey Jr. is the best casting choice for Tony Stark. I at least hope that we get to see his first armor in action. An origin story like Batman Begins is in order for this. Unfortunately Marvel has made Ironman into their own Batman, so might as well go the exact route for the movie. I would imagine Justin Hammer being the old guy in the movie. It only makes sense since that is his early rival.

CrossboneGundam
November 12th, 2006, 01:13 PM
How they will work in everyone's favorite planet devouring man in purple tights, no idea.

The same way Stan Lee did: "hay guyz, imma eatin ur planet lolz!"

Leader Desslock
November 12th, 2006, 01:27 PM
^ That'd work for me. The man eats planets, so things like dramatic and flashy entries probably don't occupy a lot of his attention. When you have a hunger that only eating a planet can satisfy, you probably don't take time to check that your socks match, or that sort of thing.

Bernard_Monsha
November 12th, 2006, 01:54 PM
^ That'd work for me. The man eats planets, so things like dramatic and flashy entries probably don't occupy a lot of his attention. When you have a hunger that only eating a planet can satisfy, you probably don't take time to check that your socks match, or that sort of thing.


He does not Galactus is an abortionist.

Vaikyuko
November 12th, 2006, 02:28 PM
@Deathscythe: I thought Y was great in the initial arcs, went downhill for a while, then came back fairly strong during the recent arcs (going to Japan from Australia, current stuff). *shrugs*

@Crossbone/Desslock: XD

What I meant was, how are they going to pitch him as, design wise. I mean, planet eater or no, he IS still a giant man in a purple suit. -_-;