Question:
Hello, John. I decided to submit a question (or a counterargument) when I read the Japanese translation of your “Is Japanese Pop Culture Aware of Religious Sensitivity?” [article]. Your argument apparently sounds correct (at least regarding Japanese videogames), but don’t you think it is very unfair for Americans to argue about foreign pop cultures without any examination of themselves?
For example, “Back to the Future” depicts Libyans as if innate terrorists or a Japanese businessman as if an arrogant supervisor of the American protagonist, while black Americans are caricaturized from a point of relatively positive view instead of the story being set in the ’50s. It proves that Hollywood film makers are indifferent to perspectives from abroad while they are very sensitive to domestic criticisms. I know the American media is sometimes very sensitive to religious or racial discriminations, but it is largely due to the fact the U.S. innately has a lot of races including African Americans as well as foreign religions including Muslim, not to speak of a lot of minorities (BTW, Japanese Moslems amount only to around 9,000 out of over 120,000,000 Japanese, or around 0.0075%). In other words, the American people only become sensitive as long as they have received / will receive criticisms or blames domestically. If the American entertainment industries are really sensitive to perspectives from abroad, they would not have produced a Madonna’s PV, where Americans hanging down from a Shinto archway, or a blasphemy story of Homer Simpson, who got down the emperor of Japan on the Sumo ring when he made a trip to Tokyo with his family!
I’m afraid that the question and John’s answer sound as if only Japanese were insensitive to perspectives from foreigners. However, I think that pop cultures including both Hollywood and Japanese anime are innately indifferent to perspectives from abroad. Don’t you?
Furthermore, I must say that it is incorrect your theory that the Japanese creators are insensitive to icons or symbols of foreign religions, because they are also insensitive to Japanese traditional religions. See a villain from “Sailor Moon”; she was named after Amaterasu, a goddess from Japanese Shinto, and no Japanese allegedly condemned the creators. Sakura from Urusei Yatsura was a Miko, or Shinto shrine maiden, and was frequently caricatured.
Many Japanese readers seem disappointed with your mostly correct, but pretty unfair argument. I know Ask John is aimed principally at anime fans in English-speaking world, but don’t you think you should discuss the subject once more for your faithful Japanese fans?
(more…)